Physicians Beware! Psychiatrist Arrested for Drug Company Payola

A 53 year old Maryland psychiatrist, Dr. Peter Gleason, was arrested, and later charged for doing something that has become common among doctors: promoting a drug for purposes other than those approved by the federal government.

Prosecutors say that Dr. Gleason went too far.

At hundreds of speeches and seminars where he was rewarded with generous fees (more than $100,000 last year alone), Dr. Gleason advised other physicians that a powerful drug for narcolepsy (Xyrem) could be prescribed for depression and pain relief.

In doing so, he conspired with the drug’s manufacturer (Jazz Pharmaceuticals) to recommend it for potentially dangerous uses. The case has put the spotlight on the murky financial relationships between drug companies and the physicians they use to promote their medicines.

Companies cannot directly advertise drugs for purposes not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. But getting drugs prescribed for unapproved uses can increase a drug’s sales, so companies often skirt the rules by sponsoring seminars where doctors are paid to make presentations promoting their drugs, including the “off label” uses.


New York Times (free registration required to read the whole article)
Read the full article / Visit this resource

Roxanne RN | Sat, 04/21/2007 - 11:06am

Roxanne
RN, Retired from VA, Onto New Ventures

Doctor's traditionally have used drugs for purposes other than advertised on the label. Consider aspirin, for instance, and all the uses it has: fever, anticoagulant, pain control, gargling to decrease throat inflammation, etc.. How many of these uses are advertised on the label per the Food and Drug Administration? For instance, aspirin with suspected heart attack victims was used long before the final approval in 1999 by the FDA.

This off-label use by doctor's is not only legal, it is a moral responsibility.

In the case cited above, Dr. Gleason believed in the use of Xyrem for insomnia as it had a lot less serious side effects and was not addictive as many other sleeping aids are. So, he prescribed it for his patients. This was not wrong! He helped a lot of patients, and even the American Medical Association endorses his actions.

The drug company then sponsored Dr. Gleason in various seminars/lectures. This also is not wrong. Drug sponsored seminars occur constantly, and physicians are the major educators.

Dr. Gleason was not the criminal. The FBI solely used him to build their case against the drug company. Yet, it was Dr. Gleason's good name and livelihood which suffered as a result.